All issues

List of references:

1. M. J. Beilby. C1–channels in Chara // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. B. — 1982. — V. 299. — P. 435–445. — DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0142. — ads: 1982RSPTB.299..435B.
2. P. C. Dauby, Th. Desaive, H. Croisier, Ph. Kolh. Standing waves in the FitzHugh–Nagumo model of cardiac electrical activity // Phys. Rev. E. — 2006. — V. 73. — P. 021908. — DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.021908. — ads: 2006PhRvE..73b1908D.
3. E. Davies. Electrical signals in plants: facts and hypotheses / Plant Electrophysiology. Theory and Methods. — Ed. Volkov A. G. — Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2006. — P. 407–422.
4. H. Dziubinska. Ways of signal transmission and physiological role of electrical potential in plants // Acta Soc. Bot. Polon. — 2003. — V. 72. — P. 309–318. — DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2003.040.
5. R. Fitzhugh. Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane // Biophys J. — 1961. — V. 1. — P. 445–466. — DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(61)86902-6.
6. J. Fromm. Long-distance electrical signaling and physiological functions in higher plants / Plant Electrophysiology. Theory and Methods. — Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2006. — P. 269–285. — Ed. Volkov A. G.
7. I. V. Garkusha, V. A. Petrov, V. A. Vasiliev, Yu. M. Romanovsky. Propagating of bioelectric potentials in green plants’conducting system. Mathematical modeling and experiment // Proc. SPIE. — 2002. — V. 4707. — P. 384–394. — DOI: 10.1117/12.475624. — ads: 2002SPIE.4707..384G.
8. T. E. E. Grams, S. Lautner, H. H. Felle, R. Matyssek, J. Fromm. Heat-induced electrical signals affect cytoplasmic and apoplastic pH as well as photosynthesis during propagation through the maize leaf // Plant Cell. Environ. — 2009. — V. 32. — P. 319–326. — DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01922.x. — ads: 2009pso..book.....G.
9. C. Koziolek, T. E. E. Grams, U. Schreiber, R. Matyssek, J. Fromm. Transient knockout of photosynthesis mediated by electrical signals // New Phytologist. — 2003. — V. 161. — P. 715–722. — DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00985.x.
10. S. Lautner, T. E. E. Grams, R. Matyssek, J. Fromm. Characteristics of electrical signals in poplar and responses in photosynthesis // Plant. Physiol. — 2005. — V. 138. — P. 2200–2209. — DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.064196.
11. H. Mummert, D. Gradmann. Action potentials in Acetabularia: measurement and simulation of voltagegated fluxes // J. Membrane Biol. — 1991. — V. 124. — P. 265–273. — DOI: 10.1007/BF01994359.
12. E. V. Pankratova, A. V. Polovinkin, B. Spagnolo. Suppression of noise in FitzHugh–Nagumo model driven by a strong periodic signal // Phys. Let. A. — 2005. — V. 344. — P. 43–50. — DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.099. — ads: 2005PhLA..344...43P.
13. T. K. Shajahan, A. R. Nayak, R. Pandit. Spiral-wave turbulence and its control in the presence of inhomogeneities in four mathematical models of cardiac tissue // PLoS ONE. — 2009. — V. 5. — P. e4738. — ads: 2009PLoSO...4.4738S.
14. T. Sibaoka. Excitable cells in mimosa // Science. — 1962. — V. 137. — P. 226. — DOI: 10.1126/science.137.3525.226. — ads: 1962Sci...137..226S.
15. T. Sibaoka. Rapid plant movements triggered by action potentials // Bot. Mag. Tokyo. — 1991. — V. 104. — P. 73–95. — DOI: 10.1007/BF02493405.
16. B. E. Steinberg, L. Glass, A. Shrier, G. Dud. The role of heterogeneities and intercellular coupling in wave propagation in cardiac tissue // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. — 2006. — V. 364. — P. 1299–1311. — DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1771. — MathSciNet: MR2243337. — ads: 2006RSPTA.364.1299S.
17. V. S. Sukhov, V. A. Vodeneev. A mathematical model of action potential in cells of vascular plants // J. Membrane Biol. — 2009. — V. 232. — P. 59–67. — DOI: 10.1007/s00232-009-9218-9.
18. K. H. W. J. Ten Tusscher, O. Bernus, R. Hren, A. V. Panfilov. Comparison of electrophysiological models for human ventricular cells and tissues // Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. — 2006. — V. 90. — P. 326–345. — DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2005.05.015.
19. K. H. W. J. Ten Tusscher, A. V. Panfilov. Cell model for efficient simulation of wave propagation in human ventricular tissue under normal and pathological conditions // Phys. Med. Biol. — 2006. — V. 51. — P. 6141–6156. — DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/23/014.
20. K. Trebacz, H. Dziubinska, E. Krol. Electrical signals in long-distance communication in plants / Communication in plants. Neuronal aspects of plant life. — Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2006. — P. 277–290. — Ed. Baluska F., Mancuso S., Volkmann D.
21. В. А. Васильев, И. В. Гаркуша, В. А. Петров, Ю. М. Романовский, Ю. Х. Шогенов. Светоиндуцированная электрическая активность зеленых растений // Биофизика. — 2003. — Т. 48, № 4. — С. 706–716.
22. В. А. Воденеев, В. А. Опритов, С. С. Пятыгин. Изменение внеклеточного pH при генерации потенциала действия у высшего растения Cucurbita pepo // Физиология растений. — 2006. — Т. 53, № 4. — С. 538–545.
23. В. А. Опритов, С. С. Пятыгин, В. Г. Ретивин. Биоэлектрогенез высших растений. — М: Наука, 1991. — 213 с.
24. А. Б. Рубин. Биофизика. — М: Высшая школа, 1987. — Т. 2. — 313 с.