All issues

List of references:

1. А. С. Гвай, Л. А. Аверьянова. Анализ методик определения дозы облучения в рентгеновской компьютерной томографии // Вестник НТУ «ХПИ». — 2013. — № 39(1012). — С. 41–47.
   • A. S. Gvay, L. A. Averyanova. Аnalysis techniques in determining exposure dose in X-ray computed tomographys // Herald of the National Technical University "KhPI". Subject issue: Information Science and Modelling. — Kharkov: NTU “KhPI”, 2013. — no. 39(1012). — P. 41–47. — in Russian.
2. В. К. Иванов, В. В. Кащеев, С. Ю. Чекин, А. Н. Меняйло, Е. А. Пряхин, А. Ф. Цыб, Ф. А. Метлер. Оценка радиационного риска медицинского облучения в терминах эффективной и органных доз // Радиация и риски. — 2012. — Т. 21, № 4.
   • V. K. Ivanov, V. V. Kashcheev, S. Yu. Chekin, A. N. Menyaylo, E. A. Pryakhin, A. F. Tsyb, F. A. Mettler. Estimation of risk from medical radiation exposure based on effective and organ dose // Radiation and Risks. — 2012. — V. 21, no. 4. — in Russian.
3. В. В. Кащеев, Е. А. Пряхин, А. Н. Меняйло, С. Ю. Чекин, В. К. Иванов. Расчет эквивалентных доз в отдельных органах и тканях и величины пожизненного радиационного риска развития рака при проведении типовых обследований с использованием компьютерной томографии // Радиация и риск. — 2013. — Т. 22, № 3.
   • V. V. Kashcheev, E. A. Pryakhin, A. N. Menyaylo, S. Yu. Chekin, V. K. Ivanov. Calculation of equivalent doses to organs and tissues, as well as lifetime attributable risk from typical computed tomography imaging // Radiation and Risks. — 2013. — V. 22, no. 3. — in Russian.
4. A. Akar, H. Baltaş, U. Çevik, F. Korkmaz, N. T. Okumuşoğlu. Measurement of attenuation coefficients for bone, muscle, fat and water at 140, 364 and 662 keV c-ray energies // JQSRT. — 2006. — V. 102, no. 2. — P. 203–11. — DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2006.02.007. — ads: 2006JQSRT.102..203A.
5. D. A. Bradley, C. S. Chong, A. M. Ghose. Photon absorptiometric studies elements, mixtures and substances of biomedical interest // Phys Med Biol. — 1986. — V. 31. — P. 267–273. — DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/31/3/005.
6. J. A. Christner, J. M. Kofler, C. H. McCollough. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning // AJR Am J Roentgenol. — 2010. — V. 194, no. 4. — P. 881–9. — DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3462.
7. K. Fujii, T. Aoyama, S. Koyama, C. Kawaura. Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations // The British Journal of Radiology. — 2007. — V. 80. — P. 657–667. — DOI: 10.1259/bjr/97260522.
8. J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients from 1 keV to 20MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 an additional substances of Dosimetric interest. — 1995. — P. 5632. — National Institute of Standards and Technology, Physical Reference Data.
9. M. S. Usanov, N. S. Kulberg, A. V. Petraikin, S. P. Morozov. Newly developed curvelet-based noise reduction algorithm for volume CT data / ESR 2018 Congress. — 2018. — Vien, Austria.
10. C. Won Kim, J. H. Kim. Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOMC images // Medical Physics. — 2014. — V. 41, no. 1. — 011901. — ads: 2014MedPh..41a1901W.