All issues
- 2026 Vol. 18
- 2025 Vol. 17
- 2024 Vol. 16
- 2023 Vol. 15
- 2022 Vol. 14
- 2021 Vol. 13
- 2020 Vol. 12
- 2019 Vol. 11
- 2018 Vol. 10
- 2017 Vol. 9
- 2016 Vol. 8
- 2015 Vol. 7
- 2014 Vol. 6
- 2013 Vol. 5
- 2012 Vol. 4
- 2011 Vol. 3
- 2010 Vol. 2
- 2009 Vol. 1
Small object detection in aerial images using convolutional neural networks
pdf (1425K)
This paper addresses the problem of detecting small objects in visible-spectrum aerial imagery. High background variability and weak feature saliency make small object detection a non-trivial task. Under such conditions, classical computer vision algorithms based on hand-crafted descriptors exhibit low efficiency, prompting a shift towards deep neural network architectures, which demonstrate superior generalization capability and robustness to false positives. We selected a one-stage approach based on a neural network predictive model as the primary object detection method. Also, several neural network architectures belonging to this class were analyzed, outlining their advantages and disadvantages. As the baseline detector, we adopted YOLO version 11 and incorporated a multi-scale feature aggregation module (which combines information from neural network layers operating at different scales) and a dimension-aware selective integration module (which automatically determines the dimension (channel, height, or width) along which to process features and fuses them selectively). These modifications aim to both enhance computational efficiency, enabling deployment of neural network models onboard aerial vehicles for real-time image analysis, and improve small object detection accuracy. Given the complexity of image annotation, we used an open synthetic image database containing approximately 4 000 images for training and testing (with a 90/10 split, respectively). We extend the training set using various random augmentation techniques. To evaluate the performance of the resulting predictive models, we employed mean Average Precision across all classes, using both a fixed 50% intersectionover- union threshold and a varying threshold from 50% to 95%. Overfitting was monitored by analyzing loss curves during training process. The proposed modifications to the YOLO architecture reduced image processing time by a factor of two while maintaining detection accuracy.
Copyright © 2026 Bazhenov S.A., Khodyrev R.R., Kabanova T.V., Shipilov S.E., Vrazhnov D.A., Kistenev Y.V.
Indexed in Scopus
Full-text version of the journal is also available on the web site of the scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.RU
The journal is included in the Russian Science Citation Index
The journal is included in the RSCI
International Interdisciplinary Conference "Mathematics. Computing. Education"





