Результаты поиска по 'topological separability':
Найдено статей: 2
  1. Koganov A.V.
    Representation of groups by automorphisms of normal topological spaces
    Computer Research and Modeling, 2009, v. 1, no. 3, pp. 243-249

    The famous fact [3, 5] of existence of an exact representation for any finite group in the form of the full automorphism group of a finite graph was generalize in [4]. For an arbitrary group exact representation exists in the form of the full automorphism group of Kolmogorov topological space (weak type of separability T0). For a finite group a finite space may be chosen, thus allowing to restore a finite graph with the same number of vertices and having the same automorphism group. Such topological spaces and graphs are called topological imprints and graph imprints of a group (T-imprints and G-imprints, respectively). The question of maximum type of separability of a topological space for which T-imprint can be obtained for any group is open. The author proves that the problem can be solved for the class of normal topology (maximal type of separability T4+T0). Special finite T-imprint for a symmetric group may be obtained as a discrete topology; for any other group minimal cardinality of normal T-imprint is countable. There is a generic procedure to construct a T-imprint for any group. For a finite group this procedure allows finite space partitioning into subspaces having G-imprint of the original group as their connectivity graphs.

    Views (last year): 1.
  2. Shriethar N., Muthu M.
    Topology-based activity recognition: stratified manifolds and separability in sensor space
    Computer Research and Modeling, 2025, v. 17, no. 5, pp. 829-850

    While working on activity recognition using wearable sensors for healthcare applications, the main issue arises in the classification of activities. When we attempt to classify activities like walking, sitting, or running from accelerometer and gyroscope data, the signals often overlap and noise complicates the classification process. The existing methods do not have solid mathematical foundations to handle this issue. We started with the standard magnitude approach where one can compute $m =  \sqrt{a^2_1 + a^2_2 + a^2_3}$ from the accelerometer readings, but this approach failed because different activities ended up in overlapping regions. We therefore developed a different approach. Instead of collapsing the 6-dimensional sensor data into simple magnitudes, we keep all six dimensions and treat each activity as a rectangular box in this 6D space. We define these boxes using simple interval constraints. For example, walking occurs when the $x$-axis accelerometer reading is between $2$ and $4$, the $y$-axis reading is between $9$ and $10$, and so on. The key breakthrough is what we call a separability index $s = \frac{d_{\min}^{}}{\sigma}$ that determines how accurately the classification will work. Here dmin represents how far apart the activity boxes are, and $\sigma$ represents the amount of noise present. From this simple idea, we derive a mathematical formula $P(\text{error}) \leqslant (n-1)\exp\left(-\frac{s^2}8\right)$  that predicts the error rate even before initiating the experiment. We tested this on the standard UCI-HAR and WISDM datasets and achieved $86.1 %$ accuracy. The theoretical predictions matched the actual results within $3 %$. This approach outperforms the traditional magnitude methods by $30.6 %$ and explains why certain activities overlap with each other.

Indexed in Scopus

Full-text version of the journal is also available on the web site of the scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.RU

The journal is included in the Russian Science Citation Index

The journal is included in the RSCI

International Interdisciplinary Conference "Mathematics. Computing. Education"