All issues
- 2025 Vol. 17
- 2024 Vol. 16
- 2023 Vol. 15
- 2022 Vol. 14
- 2021 Vol. 13
- 2020 Vol. 12
- 2019 Vol. 11
- 2018 Vol. 10
- 2017 Vol. 9
- 2016 Vol. 8
- 2015 Vol. 7
- 2014 Vol. 6
- 2013 Vol. 5
- 2012 Vol. 4
- 2011 Vol. 3
- 2010 Vol. 2
- 2009 Vol. 1
-
The adaptive Gaussian receptive fields for spiking encoding of numeric variables
Computer Research and Modeling, 2025, v. 17, no. 3, pp. 389-400Conversion of numeric data to the spiking form and information losses in this process are serious problems limiting usage of spiking neural networks in applied informational systems. While physical values are represented by numbers, internal representation of information inside spiking neural networks is based on spikes — elementary objects emitted and processed by neurons. This problem is especially hard in the reinforcement learning applications where an agent should learn to behave in the dynamic real world because beside the accuracy of the encoding method, its dynamic characteristics should be considered as well. The encoding algorithm based on the Gaussian receptive fields (GRF) is frequently used. In this method, one numeric variable fed to the network is represented by spike streams emitted by a certain set of network input nodes. The spike frequency in each stream is determined by proximity of the current variable value to the center of the receptive field corresponding to the given input node. In the standard GRF algorithm, the receptive field centers are placed equidistantly. However, it is inefficient in the case of very uneven distribution of the variable encoded. In the present paper, an improved version of this method is proposed which is based on adaptive selection of the Gaussian centers and spike stream frequencies. This improved GRF algorithm is compared with its standard version in terms of amount of information lost in the coding process and of accuracy of classification models built on spike-encoded data. The fraction of information retained in the process of the standard and adaptive GRF encoding is estimated using the direct and reverse encoding procedures applied to a large sample from the triangular probability distribution and counting coinciding bits in the original and restored samples. The comparison based on classification was performed on a task of evaluation of current state in reinforcement learning. For this purpose, the classification models were created by machine learning algorithms of very different nature — nearest neighbors algorithm, random forest and multi-layer perceptron. Superiority of our approach is demonstrated on all these tests.
-
Improving the quality of route generation in SUMO based on data from detectors using reinforcement learning
Computer Research and Modeling, 2024, v. 16, no. 1, pp. 137-146This work provides a new approach for constructing high-precision routes based on data from transport detectors inside the SUMO traffic modeling package. Existing tools such as flowrouter and routeSampler have a number of disadvantages, such as the lack of interaction with the network in the process of building routes. Our rlRouter uses multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), where the agents are incoming lanes and the environment is the road network. By performing actions to launch vehicles, agents receive a reward for matching data from transport detectors. Parameter Sharing DQN with the LSTM backbone of the Q-function was used as an algorithm for multi-agent reinforcement learning.
Since the rlRouter is trained inside the SUMO simulation, it can restore routes better by taking into account the interaction of vehicles within the network with each other and with the network infrastructure. We have modeled diverse traffic situations on three different junctions in order to compare the performance of SUMO’s routers with the rlRouter. We used Mean Absoluter Error (MAE) as the measure of the deviation from both cumulative detectors and routes data. The rlRouter achieved the highest compliance with the data from the detectors. We also found that by maximizing the reward for matching detectors, the resulting routes also get closer to the real ones. Despite the fact that the routes recovered using rlRouter are superior to the routes obtained using SUMO tools, they do not fully correspond to the real ones, due to the natural limitations of induction-loop detectors. To achieve more plausible routes, it is necessary to equip junctions with other types of transport counters, for example, camera detectors.
Indexed in Scopus
Full-text version of the journal is also available on the web site of the scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.RU
The journal is included in the Russian Science Citation Index
The journal is included in the RSCI
International Interdisciplinary Conference "Mathematics. Computing. Education"




